Exploring the Apple Studio Display: Insights and Opinions
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Apple Studio Display
I find great excitement in Apple's product launches, especially when they come with intriguing shortcomings. While I appreciate their 'insanely great' offerings that serve their audiences perfectly, those aren't nearly as engaging to discuss.
The Studio Display stands out as one of the most polarizing Apple releases I've encountered. It exemplifies Apple's signature style: visually stunning, highly functional, yet exorbitantly priced. After a month of use, I've gathered five key observations.
Section 1.1: Quality of the Display Panel
One noteworthy advantage is that it’s indeed possible to receive an exceptional panel from Apple. Although I cherished my 5K iMac, I was never completely satisfied with its display. This may sound surprising given my previous accolades for its 27-inch screen, but Apple's quality control issues have long led to a "panel lottery" that plagues LCD technology.
My 2017 5K iMac had slightly darkened corners and uneven screen uniformity. I considered reaching out to Apple but decided against it after witnessing similar flaws in every 5K iMac and iMac Pro displayed in-store. Many had even worse issues than mine.
However, I'm pleased to report that the panel on my Studio Display is nearly flawless. Uniformity is spot-on across the entire screen, with minimal fall-off at the edges. This gives me hope that Apple's quality assurance has improved.
Section 1.2: The Webcam's Shortcomings
The webcam has been a point of contention in every initial review of the Studio Display, including my own—rightfully so, as it's quite poor and feels out of place on a monitor priced at £1,500.
Supporters of the Studio Display urged patience, promising a software update would rectify the issues. After waiting, I can confirm that the update did little to enhance the image quality. It only slightly improved the responsiveness of the Center Stage feature. The camera's image quality remains unsatisfactory, suggesting we're dealing with subpar hardware designed primarily for profit.
Subsection 1.2.1: Alternatives in the Market
While there are admirable alternatives, such as the Huawei MateView and various Dell monitors, none deliver the same sharpness or color depth as the Studio Display's 5K panel. If you’ve experienced a 5K iMac, you’ll find that other monitors seem dull and lackluster in comparison. LG's UltraFine is the only other 5K option, which justifies the Studio Display's hefty price tag, even as it keeps users dependent on Apple.
Section 1.3: The Price of Customization
Apple consistently introduces optional extras that come with a hefty price tag. The Studio Display includes a tilt-adjustable stand by default or a VESA mount at no extra charge. However, if you desire a height-adjustable stand, prepare to shell out an additional £400.
This exorbitant cost only grants you the ability to adjust the monitor's height, something you could easily achieve with a monitor riser or a couple of books. Most likely, you'll only use that hinge once.
Chapter 2: Future of the Studio Display
Apple's decision to forego ProMotion in the Studio Display is disappointing, especially since it has become an increasingly valuable feature in my 16-inch MacBook Pro. Many have pointed out that the current Thunderbolt connections can't support the required refresh rates for ProMotion. However, I believe we might see this feature in future Apple displays, perhaps in the next iteration of the Pro Display XDR.
Final Thoughts
The Studio Display is undoubtedly an impressive product that draws attention. The screen outshines the typical 5K display, appearing brighter and exhibiting fewer manufacturing defects based on my experience. Yet, I can't recommend it to anyone except die-hard Apple fans due to its steep price. While one could argue that you're paying for superior build quality and an unmatched display, £1,500 is still an enormous sum.
Apple's choice to stop producing standalone displays in 2011 and then re-emerge with a £6,000 reference monitor has limited their market options. For businesses like mine, the cost is manageable, but for hobbyists or casual users seeking a quality display, it’s a challenging investment. If you can overlook the camera's flaws and can afford it, go ahead. Otherwise, consider waiting for a second-hand option or explore the excellent 4K alternatives available, as Apple is unlikely to lower its prices anytime soon.
Before You Go
Join my behind-the-scenes mailing list to stay updated! If you enjoy my writing, consider supporting my work on Medium. Click here to join and contribute to my efforts!